Japanese Adjectives

What's an Adjective?

An adjective is something that qualifies, specifies, describes, details, etc. something else. Adjectives can be words or phrases. And the "something else" that they describe is a noun.

For example, say you have the word "car." That's a noun.

Now say there's a bunch of cars out there and you want to specify which car exactly you're talking about. You gotta describe it. With an adjective:

• The blue car.
• Blue:
  Adjective for the noun car.

But sometimes a single word isn't enough to describe the noun. You need more! You need a whole phrase:

• The car with feet.
• With:
  Preposition that introduces an adjective phrase.
• Feet:
  Something that car has?!
  Wow. That's specific.

And sometimes we describe nouns by an action performed by the noun or upon the noun. In either case, the noun is subject of a clause, a subordinate adjective clause.

• The car crashes into a tree.
• Car:
  Subject. Agent.
• To crash into:
  Verb.
• A tree:
  Victim. Object/Patient.
• The car that crashed into the tree.
• That:
  Preposition that introduces a subordinate clause.
• Crashed into the tree:
  Subordinate clause describing something.
  In this case: the car.
• The car was bought by him.
• Car:
  Subject. Patient.
• Him:
  Agent.
• That car that he bought.
• That: preposition.
• He bought: description.

Disregarding the specifics, adjectives generally boil down to two kinds: lone words and phrases or clauses. One is obviously simpler than the other.

The clauses are also sometimes called "relative clauses." And words like "that," "who," etc. are sometimes called "relative pronouns."

There's also more specific kinds worth nothing about:

Words like "my," "your," "his," "Jack's," etc. They're called "possessive adjectives," because they describe something is possessed by someone or something else.

Phrases like "very cold," "very blue," where you have a word modifying the adjective work.

Appositives like "Kamina, my brother, believes in me" where you have a description right after the noun, without a preposition. (you could say "Kamina, who is my brother, believes in me," but that's different.)

How Adjectives Work in Japanese?

The way adjectives work in Japanese is pretty different to how it works in English. They share a little tiny bit of similarity, and then it's all different.

Basic Adjectives

First off, ignoring technicalities, Japanese adjectives pretty much always come before the noun. Just like English:

• aoi kuruma 青い車
  Blue car.
• kimyou na kuruma 奇妙な車
  Bizarre car.
• yume no kuruma 夢の車
  Dream car.
• kare no kuruma 彼の車
  His car.

Intensifiers

Intensifiers and other adverbs also come right before the adjective, just like in English:

• oishii keeki 美味しいケーキ
  Tasty cake.
• totemo oishii keeki とても美味しいケーキ
  Very tasty cake.
• samui 寒い
  Cold.
• sukoshi samui 少し寒い
  A bit cold.

Sometimes the translation doesn't match literally, but so long it's intense the meaning is conveyed.

• sugoi 凄い
  Incredible.
• MECHAKUCHA SUGEEEEeeee!1!1111 メチャクチャすげぇぇぇーーーーっ！
  AWWWWSSUUUUUMMMMMnnndefjnsdkfdsfknskdfsdfnlsnf

The problem is, Japanese adjectives pretty, pretty, PRETTY much always come before the noun. Even when they don't in English.

Adjective Phrases and Clauses

Specifically, adjective phrases and relative clauses that would come after the noun in English come before the noun in Japanese:

• ashi ga aru 足がある
  To have feet.
• ashi no aru kuruma 足のある車
  Car that has feet.
  Car with feet.
• ki ni butsukaru 木にぶつかる
  To crash into a tree.
• ki ni butsukatta kuruma 木にぶつかった車
  Car that crashed into a tree.

Another pretty big difference is that Japanese literally doesn't have prepositions. That's right: no prepositions. None of "that," "who," "of," etc. Japanese has postpositions, these come after, not before, they're called "particles," by the way. But prepositions? That western backwards stuff? Nope!

This can be seen by the fact that there's really nothing connecting those relative clauses to the nouns.

If you have a clause, those things that end in a verb in Japanese, and you add a noun after the verb, it instantly turns into an adjective clause. Just like that:

• shaberu 喋る
  To speak.
• shaberu neko 喋る猫
  Cat [that] speaks.
  (a.k.a.)
  Speaking cat.
• shinda 死んだ
  Died.
• Past tense of:
• shinu 死ぬ
  To die.
• shinda neko 死んだ猫
  Cat [that] died.
  (a.k.a.)
  Dead cat.

You might wanna read about

Prepositional Phrases

English adjectives introduced by prepositions like "with," "in," "on," etc. are said in other ways, since those prepositions don't exist in Japanese.

The equivalent of a simple English preposition is usually a whole clause in Japanese:

• kuruma no naka ni iru neko 車の中にいる猫
  The cat [that] is inside of the car.
• beddo no ue ni aru dakimakura ベッドの上にある抱きまくら
  The hug pillow [that] is atop of the bed.

Past Adjectives

Japanese also has a fundamental difference from English about the past tense. In English, we need to shuffle words around into a relative clause to say something was in a certain way in the past. In Japanese, we literally conjugate inflect the adjective and keep it exactly where it was before:

• hayai kuruma 速い車
  Fast car.
• hayakatta kuruma 速かった車
  Car [that] was fast.
• kimyou na bouken 奇妙な冒険
  Bizarre adventure.
• kimyou datta bouken 奇妙だった冒険
  Adventure [that] was bizarre.
• futsuu no koukousei 普通の高校生
  Normal student.
• futsuu datta koukousei 普通だった高校生
  Student [that] was normal.

Although this can look like it's a bit weird of first, try to imagine the word "crash," and "crashed." Now think of "bizarre," and "bizarred." Well, bizarred isn't a word. But in Japanese in the example above it's like you said a "bizarred adventure." An adventure that was bizarre.

Negative Adjectives

In Japanese, the same thing happens with negative adjectives: we just inflect the adjectives instead of doing something more complicated with it. You can imagine the Japanese language is pretty lazy when it comes to this stuff. Or maybe Latin languages just over-complicate too much.

• hayakunai kuruma 速くない車
  Car [that] is not fast.
  Non-fast car.
• kimyou denai bouken 奇妙でない冒険
  Adventure [that] is not bizarre.
  Non-bizarre adventure.
• futsuu denai koukousei 普通でない高校生
  High-school student [that] is not normal.
  Non-normal high-school student.
  Abnormal high-school student.

Since all negative inflections in Japanese are done by adding the -nai.

For example, you can make a negative past by inflecting the -nai into its past form -nakatta:

• hayakunakatta kuruma 速くなかった車
  The cat [that] was not fast.

And colloquialisms are also shared:

• hayee kuruma 速ぇ車
  Fast car.
• hayakunee kuruma 速くねぇ車
  Non-fast car.
  Fastn't car.

Kinds of Japanese Adjectives

Now you might have noticed already that there's something fishy going on. This article is talking about adjectives. Words of the adjective kind. But some of those words in Japanese get an inflection, others get a na な particle, others have a no の particle What's up with that? Why they vary?

Well. It just happens that the Japanese language doesn't have one, but two different types of adjectives!

1. The i-adjectives.
   Adjectives that end in -i ～い.
   True adjectives: strong, independent adjectives who don't need no particle.
2. The na-adjectives.
   Adjectives that take the na な particle.
   This particle is actually the da だ copula's lesser known cousin.
3. The no-adjectives.
   Not really adjectives, mostly nouns turned into adjectives by the genitive case marking particle no の.
   This no の particle is sometimes the da だ copula's estranged and thrice removed aunt.

These two three different types of adjectives clearly work differently and are used for different things. I won't go in detail here, because you can click the links above and go read about each kind in detail in their own article.

What I'll do is keep talking about properties all these adjectives have in common in Japanese. Like the fact they all come before nouns.

Varying Kinds of Same Adjective

Sometimes, a single adjective can be found as different kinds of adjectives.

For example, various words for i-adjective and no-adjective variants:

• shiroi bara 白いバラ
  shiro no bara 白のバラ
  White rose.

In the case of colors, generally the i-adjective is used, it's more mundane, I guess. The no-adjective version is often preferred for titles (of movies, etc.) and names.

A couple of words have historically diverged into i-adjective and na-adjective variants:

• chiisai 小さい
  chiisana 小さな
  Little.
• ookii 大きい
  ookina 大きな
  Big.

In this case, probably sometime along Japanese's history, there was the ooki and chiisa ooki naru ki 大きなる木, "tree [that] be big," which is where you get na-adjectives from, while someone else was just adding the ~i ～い morpheme to it.

Anyways, both variants of these two words really mean the same thing. The main difference is that chiisana and ookina are only used before nouns. They can't be used in the predicative.

That is, normally if you remove the na of a na-adjective you get a stand-alone word, but you can't do that with chiisana and ookina because chiisa and ooki aren't words. Only chiisana, chiisai, ookina, and ookii are words.

Besides that, it's up to usage. Sometimes ookii is used more than ookina and vice-versa.

Predicative Adjectives

So far we've talked about attributive adjectives: adjectives that attribute nouns by coming before them. Predicative adjectives, while not as interesting, are important to mention too. They're adjectives that are part of a subject's predicate.

In Japanese, we mark the subject of a phrase by adding the ga が particle after it. And anything that's not the subject is the predicate. So:

• neko ga kawaii 猫が可愛い
  Cats [are] cute.
• ore ga futsuu 俺が普通
  I [am] normal.

In the predicative form, no の and na な adjectives don't have their no and na's. Ironic, I know. So futsuu no becomes just futsuu. Likewise, kimyou na would become just kimyou.

Adding Da だ Copula

Now you may have noticed we got these implicit words "[are]" and "[am]" up there. That's because those are the English copula. And the Japanese copula is da だ, or desu です, and that copula isn't part of the phrases above.

This is normal. In Japanese the copula is frequently omitted. So much that deliberately adding the casual copula may sound assertive.

• ore ga futsuu da 俺が普通だ
  I am normal.
  (ノ°Д°）ノ︵ ┻━┻

The above is alright, because futsuu is a no-adjective. With an i-adjective, though, it's grammatically incorrect to add the da だ directly after them. Because of reasons.

Mainly because it's wrong to add da だ after something that's not a noun. The no-adjectives are nouns. The na-adjectives are nouns glued to the na attributive copula. The i-adjectives are not nouns, they are "true" adjectives. So that won't do.

That means you need to turn the i-adjective into a noun by adding a no の particle to it, or the contraction of that particle contraction, n ん.

• neko ga kawaii no da 猫が可愛いのだ
  neko ga kawaii-n-da 猫が可愛いんだ
  Cats are cute.
  (WHO DARES DISAGREE?!??!!? HUH??!?!?)

To make matters more complicated, or less complicated. The above rule doesn't apply to desu です. Because that's a polite copula. So someone thought it should be an exception or something. Anyways. You can put desu right after i-adjectives.

• neko ga kawaii desu 猫が可愛いです
  Cats are cute. (politely.)

And you can put no の and n ん between them too if you want. It sounds assertive, too, probably because it sounds similar to no-da and n-da.

• neko ga kawaii no desu 猫が可愛いのです
  neko ga kawaii-n-desu 猫が可愛いんです
  Cats are cute. (I firmly and politely assert my ideology.)

Adding Wa は Particle

Another thing to note about predicative adjectives is that Japanese generally prefers to use topics rather than subjects. In practice, this means the wa は topic-marking particle tends to be used instead of the ga が subject-marking particle.

• neko wa kawaii 猫は可愛い
  Cats [are] cute.

Obviously, wa and ga are the same thing, except when they are not. Which is a lot of times.

The most obvious case is when you have both wa and ga in the same sentence. For example:

• mimi ga nagai 耳が長い
  mimi wa nagai 耳は長い
  Ears [are] long.
• The translation is identical here.
• erufu wa mimi ga nagai エルフは耳が長い
  As for elves, ears [are] long.
  Elves [have] long ears.
• Here, we talk about the topic, Elves, and comment about how the ears are long.
• If we switched particles, we'd get this:
• mimi wa erufu ga nagai 耳はエルフが長い
  As for ears, elves are long.
• This doesn't make sense.
• Did you mean...
• mimi wa erufu no hou ga nagai 耳はエルフの方が長い
  As for ears, the side of the elves [is] longer.
  (we use hou 方 when we're comparing the elves' side with the humans' side, etc. It essentially means this:)
  As for ears, the elves' [are] longer.

And you could also say:

• erufu no mimi wa nagai エルフの耳は長い
  As for the ears of elves: long.
  Elves' ears are long.

Another intriguing case is with the na-adjectives suki 好き and kirai 嫌い. If I may add: kirai 嫌い is not an i-adjective. It comes from the verb kirau 嫌う. And suki from suku 好く. They're na-adjectives.

Anyway, whenever you say something is suki or kirai, the English translation becomes a verb, "to like" or "to dislike," but the Japanese is merely describing a thing.

• nezumi ga kirai ネズミが嫌い
  Rats [are] disliked.
  I HATE RATS@!#!#@#@3213

These adjectives are often used with the ga particle because the implicit topic here is "I." See:

• watashi wa nezumi ga kirai 私はネズミが嫌い
  As for me, rats [are] disliked.
  I hate rats.
• neko wa nezumi ga kirai 猫はネズミが嫌い
  As for cats, rats [are] disliked.
  Cats hate rats.

On the other hand, wa は can also be used to say something is liked or hated, but it becomes vastly more ambiguous.

• neko wa suki 猫は好き
  As for cats, liked.

1. I, or someone else, doesn't like a bunch of animals, but cats, specifically, those are liked, yes.
2. A bunch of animals don't like something, but cats, specifically, yes, that something is liked to them.

The exact meaning of the phrase ends up depending a lot on the context.

Adjectives from Nouns

In Japanese, adjectives can be created from nouns by adding the no particle. These are the so-called no-adjectives.

The most famous case is turning nouns into possessives:

• kare 彼
  He.
• kare no 彼の
  His.
• kare no kuruma 彼の車
  His car.

• Zeruda ゼルダ
  Zelda. (katakanization.)
• Zeruda no ゼルダの
  Zelda's.
• Zeruda no Densetsu ゼルダの伝説
  The Legend of Zelda.

But nouns may also be turned into adjectives that aren't possessives:

• densetsu 伝説
  Legend.
• densetsu no 伝説の
  Of the legend.
  Legendary.
• Densetsu no Yamada Tae 伝説の山田たえ
  The Legendary Yamada Tae.

Appositives:

• otouto no sasuke ga... 弟のサスケが…
  Sasuke, the little brother, [is]...

And a lot of other stuff. Just see the article on

Adverbs from Adjectives

In English, we sometimes turn adjectives into adverbs, so that they don't modify nouns anymore and instead modify verbs. In Japanese we can do that too, of course.

With i-adjectives that's done by inflecting the adjective into -ku ～く. With na and no adjectives it's done by replacing the attributive copula with the adverbial copula ni に.

• hayaku hashiru 速く走る
  To run fast.
• Fast modifies "to run."
• kawaiku mieru 可愛く見える
  To look cute.
• Cute modifies "to look."
• futsuu ni ikiru 普通に生きる
  To live normally.
• Normally modifies "to live."

• shoujiki na kotae 正直な答え
  Honest answer.
• shoujiki ni kotaeru 正直に答える
  To answer honestly.

Te-Forms

The te-forms of Japanese adjectives allow them to connect to each other. Which is really a complicated way of saying you can say two adjectives in sequence instead of just one.

The te-form inflection of i-adjectives is -kute ～くて. For no and na-adjectives, the attributive copula is replaced by the te-form of the da だ copula, which is de で.

• chiisakute kawaii nezumi 小さくて可愛いネズミ
  A small and cute mouse.
• kawaikute chiisai nezumi 可愛くて小さいネズミ
  A cute and small mouse.

• heibon de futsuu no koukousei 平凡で普通の高校生
  An ordinary and normal high-school student.
• futsuu de heibon no koukousei 普通で平凡の高校生
  A normal and ordinary high-school student.

• kimyou de ayashii bouken 奇妙で怪しい冒険
  A bizarre and suspicious adventure.
• ayashikute kimyou na bouken 怪しくて奇妙な冒険
  A suspicious and bizarre adventure.

Note above that when two adjectives are connected by te-form, only the first adjective gets to be in te-form, the second one is unchanged.

In particular, na and no adjectives don't get their na and no's when they're in the predicative form, only when they're attributive for some noun.

• ore ga futsuu de heibon 俺が普通で平凡
  ore ga futsuu de heibon da 俺が普通で平凡だ
  I'm normal and ordinary.
• Since heibon is predicative for ore, we don't say heibon no.
• ore ga {futsuu de heibon no koukousei} 俺が普通で平凡の高校生
  I'm a {normal and ordinary high-school student.}
• Since heibon is attributive for koukousei, we say heibon no.

Lastly, the order of adjectives in the te-form matters sometimes. Usually, it's implied the first adjective causes the second. So two adjectives tend to be said in the same order if there's a strong causal relationship between them:

• chiisakute kawaii 小さくて可愛い
  Small and cute.
• Because it's small, it's cute.
• This makes sense, because, by first observing something is small, you then conclude it's cute.
• kawaikute chiisai 可愛くて小さい
  Cute and small.
• Because it's cute, it's small.
• This doesn't make as much sense. Because things don't become small after they become cute. It's the other way around!

Of course. The implication isn't always there. Sometimes "small and cute" or "cute and small" don't really have any difference. It's just two things in parallel and one doesn't cause or depend on the other.

Like (probably) every other language in the world, the Japanese language also has adjectives. But how do the Japanese adjectives work? How do you tell an adjective from another word? How is the sentence structure with adjectives involved? In this article, I'll explain a little about them.An adjective is something that qualifies, specifies, describes, details, etc. something else. Adjectives can be words or phrases. And the "something else" that they describe is a noun.For example, say you have the word "car." That's a noun.Now say there's a bunch of cars out there and you want to specify which car exactly you're talking about. You gotta describe it. With an adjective:But sometimes a single word isn't enough to describe the noun. You need more! You need a whole phrase:And sometimes we describe nouns by an action performed by the noun or upon the noun. In either case, the noun is subject of a clause, a subordinate adjective clause.Disregarding the specifics, adjectives generally boil down to two kinds: lone words and phrases or clauses. One is obviously simpler than the other.The clauses are also sometimes called "relative clauses." And words like "that," "who," etc. are sometimes called "relative pronouns."There's also more specific kinds worth nothing about:Words like "my," "your," "his," "Jack's," etc. They're called "possessive adjectives," because they describe something is possessed by someone or something else.Phrases like "cold," "blue," where you have a word modifying the adjective work.Appositives like "Kamina,, believes in me" where you have a description right after the noun, without a preposition. (you could say "Kamina,my brother, believes in me," but that's different.)The way adjectives work in Japanese is pretty different to how it works in English. They share a little tiny bit of similarity, and then it's all different.First off, ignoring technicalities, Japanese adjectives pretty much always come before the noun. Just like English:Intensifiers and other adverbs also come right before the adjective, just like in English:Sometimes the translation doesn't match literally, but so long it's intense the meaning is conveyed.The problem is, Japanese adjectives pretty, pretty,muchcome before the noun. Even when they don't in English.Specifically, adjective phrases and relative clauses that would come after the noun in English come before the noun in Japanese:Another pretty big difference is that Japanese literally doesn't have prepositions. That's right: no prepositions. None of "that," "who," "of," etc. Japanese has postpositions, these come after, not before, they're called "particles," by the way. But prepositions? That western backwards stuff? Nope!This can be seen by the fact that there's really nothing connecting those relative clauses to the nouns.If you have a clause, those things that end in a verb in Japanese, and you add a noun after the verb, it instantly turns into an adjective clause. Just like that:You might wanna read about how verbs work in Japanese if you haven't already to understand this better.English adjectives introduced by prepositions like "with," "in," "on," etc. are said in other ways, since those prepositions don't exist in Japanese.The equivalent of a simple English preposition is usually a whole clause in Japanese:Japanese also has a fundamental difference from English about the past tense. In English, we need to shuffle words around into a relative clause to say something was in a certain way in the past. In Japanese, we literallyinflect the adjective and keep it exactly where it was before:Although this can look like it's a bit weird of first, try to imagine the word "crash," and "crashed." Now think of "bizarre," and "bizarred." Well, bizarred isn't a word. But in Japanese in the example above it's like you said a "bizarred adventure." An adventure that was bizarre.In Japanese, the same thing happens with negative adjectives: we just inflect the adjectives instead of doing something more complicated with it. You can imagine the Japanese language is pretty lazy when it comes to this stuff. Or maybe Latin languages just over-complicate too much.Since all negative inflections in Japanese are done by adding the -nai ～ない auxiliary adjective suffix , they all can be inflected further by inflecting theFor example, you can make a negative past by inflecting theinto its past formAnd colloquialisms are also shared:Now you might have noticed already that there's something fishy going on. This article is talking about adjectives. Words of the adjective kind. But some of those words in Japanese get an inflection, others get aな particle, others have aの particle What's up with that? Why they vary?Well. It just happens that the Japanese language doesn't have one, butdifferent types of adjectives!Thesethree different types of adjectives clearly work differently and are used for different things. I won't go in detail here, because you can click the links above and go read about each kind in detail in their own article.What I'll do is keep talking about properties all these adjectives have in common in Japanese. Like the fact they all come before nouns.Sometimes, a single adjective can be found as different kinds of adjectives.For example, various words for colors have both-adjective and-adjective variants:In the case of colors, generally the-adjective is used, it's more mundane, I guess. The-adjective version is often preferred for titles (of movies, etc.) and names.A couple of words have historically diverged into-adjective and-adjective variants:In this case, probably sometime along Japanese's history, there was theand morphemes , then someone was saying大き木, "tree [that]big," which is where you get-adjectives from, while someone else was just adding the～い morpheme to it.Anyways, both variants of these two words really mean the same thing. The main difference is thatandare only used before nouns. They can't be used in the predicative.That is, normally if you remove theof a-adjective you get a stand-alone word, but you can't do that withandbecauseandaren't words. Only, andare words.Besides that, it's up to usage. Sometimesis used more thanand vice-versa.So far we've talked about attributive adjectives: adjectives that attribute nouns by coming before them. Predicative adjectives, while not as interesting, are important to mention too. They're adjectives that are part of a subject's predicate.In Japanese, we mark the subject of a phrase by adding theが particle after it. And anything that's not the subject is the predicate. So:In the predicative form,の andな adjectives don't have theirand's. Ironic, I know. Sobecomes just. Likewise,would become justNow you may have noticed we got these implicit words "[are]" and "[am]" up there. That's because those are the English copula. And the Japanese copula isだ, orです, and that copula isn't part of the phrases above.This is normal. In Japanese the copula is frequently omitted. So much that deliberately adding the casual copula may sound assertive.The above is alright, becauseis a-adjective. With an-adjective, though, it's grammatically incorrect to add theだ directly after them. Because of reasons.Mainly because it's wrong to addだ after something that's not a noun. The-adjectives are nouns. The-adjectives are nouns glued to theattributive copula. The-adjectives are not nouns, they are "true" adjectives. So that won't do.That means you need to turn the-adjective into a noun by adding aの particle to it, or the contraction of that particle contraction,ん.To make matters more complicated, or less complicated. The above rule doesn't apply toです. Because that's a polite copula. So someone thought it should be an exception or something. Anyways. You can putright after-adjectives.And you can putの andん between them too if you want. It sounds assertive, too, probably because it sounds similar toandAnother thing to note about predicative adjectives is that Japanese generally prefers to use topics rather than subjects. In practice, this means theは topic-marking particle tends to be used instead of theが subject-marking particle.Obviously,andare the same thing, except when they are not. Which is a lot of times.The most obvious case is when you have bothandin the same sentence. For example:And you could also say:Another intriguing case is with the-adjectives好き and嫌い. If I may add:嫌い is not an-adjective. It comes from the verb嫌う. Andfrom好く. They're-adjectives.Anyway, whenever you say something isor, the English translation becomes a verb, "to like" or "to dislike," but the Japanese is merely describing a thing.These adjectives are often used with theparticle because the implicit topic here is "I." See:On the other hand,は can also be used to say something is liked or hated, but it becomes vastly more ambiguous.The exact meaning of the phrase ends up depending a lot on the context.In Japanese, adjectives can be created from nouns by adding the no particle. These are the so-called-adjectives.The most famous case is turning nouns into possessives:But nouns may also be turned into adjectives that aren't possessives:Appositives:And a lot of other stuff. Just see the article on no-adjectives for more examples.In English, we sometimes turn adjectives into adverbs, so that they don't modify nouns anymore and instead modify verbs. In Japanese we can do that too, of course.With-adjectives that's done by inflecting the adjective into～く. Withandadjectives it's done by replacing the attributive copula with the adverbial copulaに.The-forms of Japanese adjectives allow them to connect to each other. Which is really a complicated way of saying you can say two adjectives in sequence instead of just one.The-form inflection of-adjectives is～くて. Forand-adjectives, the attributive copula is replaced by the-form of theだ copula, which isで.Note above that when two adjectives are connected by-form, only the first adjective gets to be in-form, the second one is unchanged.In particular,andadjectives don't get theirand's when they're in the predicative form, only when they're attributive for some noun.Lastly, the order of adjectives in the-form matters sometimes. Usually, it's implied the first adjective causes the second. So two adjectives tend to be said in the same order if there's a strong causal relationship between them:Of course. The implication isn't always there. Sometimes "small and cute" or "cute and small" don't really have any difference. It's just two things in parallel and one doesn't cause or depend on the other.